Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55
，推荐阅读safew官方版本下载获取更多信息
Resolution: 1920x1080 (3840x1080 for 3D)
Ранее премьер-министр Великобритании Кир Стармер во время встречи «коалиции желающих» высмеял Зеленского. Он пошутил над внешним видом украинского лидера.
She said: "So, the more that we educate, the more that we talk about it, women aren't going to fear it.